Loading
Release from Central Pollution Control Board, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change
Published. Its values are live on the site.
Fetched directly from the publisher on 3 Oct 2026, 21:01 IST. The copy below is byte-for-byte what the publisher served.
| Geography | Period | Value | Where in the document |
|---|---|---|---|
| India | 27 September 2020 | 76 | AQI bulletin p.1–10, Index Value column: mean of all 110 city rows — every row in the table |
| Andhra Pradesh | 27 September 2020 | 37 | AQI bulletin p.1–9, Index Value column: mean of 3 city rows placed in Andhra Pradesh — Amaravati (p.1), Rajamahendravaram (p.8), Tirupati (p.9) |
| Assam | 27 September 2020 | 44 | AQI bulletin p.4, Index Value column: mean of 1 city row placed in Assam — Guwahati (p.4) |
| Bihar | 27 September 2020 | 43 | AQI bulletin p.3–8, Index Value column: mean of 4 city rows placed in Bihar — Gaya (p.3), Hajipur (p.4), Muzaffarpur (p.7), Patna (p.8) |
| Chandigarh | 27 September 2020 | 100 | AQI bulletin p.2, Index Value column: mean of 1 city row placed in Chandigarh — Chandigarh (p.2) |
Central Pollution Control Board, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. CPCB National Air Quality Index bulletin, 27 September 2020 (110 cities) (published 27 Sept 2020). Archived by the India Health Observatory on 3 Oct 2026, SHA-256 4fcde616b09a957148e52931919d5ec4a12e09d27260539823a9ea32dc09b3c4. https://indiahealthobservatory.com/sources/cpcb/releases/2236
| Delhi | 27 September 2020 | 117 | AQI bulletin p.3, Index Value column: mean of 1 city row placed in Delhi — Delhi (p.3) |
| Gujarat | 27 September 2020 | 91 | AQI bulletin p.1–9, Index Value column: mean of 6 city rows placed in Gujarat — Ahmedabad (p.1), Ankleshwar (p.1), Gandhinagar (p.3), Nandesari (p.7), Vapi (p.9), Vatva (p.9) |
| Haryana | 27 September 2020 | 84 | AQI bulletin p.1–10, Index Value column: mean of 21 city rows placed in Haryana — Ambala (p.1), Bahadurgarh (p.2), Ballabgarh (p.2), Dharuhera (p.3), Faridabad (p.3), Fatehabad (p.3), Gurugram (p.4), Hisar (p.4), Jind (p.5), Kaithal (p.5), Kurukshetra (p.6), Mandikhera (p.6), Manesar (p.6), Narnaul (p.7), Palwal (p.7), Panchkula (p.7), Panipat (p.8), Rohtak (p.8), Sirsa (p.9), Sonipat (p.9), Yamunanagar (p.10) |
| Karnataka | 27 September 2020 | 38 | AQI bulletin p.2–10, Index Value column: mean of 7 city rows placed in Karnataka — Bengaluru (p.2), Chikkaballapur (p.2), Chikkamagaluru (p.2), Hubballi (p.4), Mysuru (p.7), Ramanagara (p.8), Vijayapura (p.10) |
| Kerala | 27 September 2020 | 40 | AQI bulletin p.3–9, Index Value column: mean of 5 city rows placed in Kerala — Eloor (p.3), Ernakulam (p.3), Kannur (p.5), Kozhikode (p.6), Thiruvananthapuram (p.9) |
| Madhya Pradesh | 27 September 2020 | 67 | AQI bulletin p.2–9, Index Value column: mean of 14 city rows placed in Madhya Pradesh — Bhopal (p.2), Damoh (p.3), Dewas (p.3), Gwalior (p.4), Indore (p.4), Jabalpur (p.4), Katni (p.5), Maihar (p.6), Mandideep (p.6), Pithampur (p.8), Ratlam (p.8), Sagar (p.8), Satna (p.8), Ujjain (p.9) |
| Maharashtra | 27 September 2020 | 60 | AQI bulletin p.1–9, Index Value column: mean of 9 city rows placed in Maharashtra — Aurangabad (p.1), Chandrapur (p.2), Kalyan (p.5), Mumbai (p.6), Nagpur (p.7), Nashik (p.7), Navi Mumbai (p.7), Solapur (p.9), Thane (p.9) |
| Meghalaya | 27 September 2020 | 12 | AQI bulletin p.8, Index Value column: mean of 1 city row placed in Meghalaya — Shillong (p.8) |
| Mizoram | 27 September 2020 | 23 | AQI bulletin p.1, Index Value column: mean of 1 city row placed in Mizoram — Aizawl (p.1) |
| Nagaland | 27 September 2020 | 27 | AQI bulletin p.5, Index Value column: mean of 1 city row placed in Nagaland — Kohima (p.5) |
| Odisha | 27 September 2020 | 120 | AQI bulletin p.2–9, Index Value column: mean of 2 city rows placed in Odisha — Brajrajnagar (p.2), Talcher (p.9) |
| Punjab | 27 September 2020 | 107 | AQI bulletin p.1–8, Index Value column: mean of 7 city rows placed in Punjab — Amritsar (p.1), Jalandhar (p.5), Khanna (p.5), Ludhiana (p.6), Mandi Gobindgarh (p.6), Patiala (p.8), Rupnagar (p.8) |
| Rajasthan | 27 September 2020 | 76 | AQI bulletin p.1–7, Index Value column: mean of 7 city rows placed in Rajasthan — Ajmer (p.1), Alwar (p.1), Bhiwadi (p.2), Jaipur (p.4), Jodhpur (p.5), Kota (p.5), Pali (p.7) |
| Tamil Nadu | 27 September 2020 | 58 | AQI bulletin p.2, Index Value column: mean of 1 city row placed in Tamil Nadu — Chennai (p.2) |
| Telangana | 27 September 2020 | 38 | AQI bulletin p.4, Index Value column: mean of 1 city row placed in Telangana — Hyderabad (p.4) |
| Uttar Pradesh | 27 September 2020 | 129 | AQI bulletin p.1–9, Index Value column: mean of 13 city rows placed in Uttar Pradesh — Agra (p.1), Baghpat (p.1), Bulandshahr (p.2), Ghaziabad (p.3), Greater Noida (p.3), Hapur (p.4), Kanpur (p.5), Lucknow (p.6), Meerut (p.6), Moradabad (p.6), Muzaffarnagar (p.7), Noida (p.7), Varanasi (p.9) |
| West Bengal | 27 September 2020 | 61 | AQI bulletin p.1–9, Index Value column: mean of 4 city rows placed in West Bengal — Asansol (p.1), Howrah (p.4), Kolkata (p.5), Siliguri (p.9) |
| Geography | Period | Value | Where in the document |
|---|---|---|---|
| India | 27 September 2020 | 110 | AQI bulletin p.1–10: count of all 110 city rows — every row in the table |
| Andhra Pradesh | 27 September 2020 | 3 | AQI bulletin p.1–9: count of 3 city rows placed in Andhra Pradesh — Amaravati (p.1), Rajamahendravaram (p.8), Tirupati (p.9) |
| Assam | 27 September 2020 | 1 | AQI bulletin p.4: count of 1 city row placed in Assam — Guwahati (p.4) |
| Bihar | 27 September 2020 | 4 | AQI bulletin p.3–8: count of 4 city rows placed in Bihar — Gaya (p.3), Hajipur (p.4), Muzaffarpur (p.7), Patna (p.8) |
| Chandigarh | 27 September 2020 | 1 | AQI bulletin p.2: count of 1 city row placed in Chandigarh — Chandigarh (p.2) |
| Delhi | 27 September 2020 | 1 | AQI bulletin p.3: count of 1 city row placed in Delhi — Delhi (p.3) |
| Gujarat | 27 September 2020 | 6 | AQI bulletin p.1–9: count of 6 city rows placed in Gujarat — Ahmedabad (p.1), Ankleshwar (p.1), Gandhinagar (p.3), Nandesari (p.7), Vapi (p.9), Vatva (p.9) |
| Haryana | 27 September 2020 | 21 | AQI bulletin p.1–10: count of 21 city rows placed in Haryana — Ambala (p.1), Bahadurgarh (p.2), Ballabgarh (p.2), Dharuhera (p.3), Faridabad (p.3), Fatehabad (p.3), Gurugram (p.4), Hisar (p.4), Jind (p.5), Kaithal (p.5), Kurukshetra (p.6), Mandikhera (p.6), Manesar (p.6), Narnaul (p.7), Palwal (p.7), Panchkula (p.7), Panipat (p.8), Rohtak (p.8), Sirsa (p.9), Sonipat (p.9), Yamunanagar (p.10) |
| Karnataka | 27 September 2020 | 7 | AQI bulletin p.2–10: count of 7 city rows placed in Karnataka — Bengaluru (p.2), Chikkaballapur (p.2), Chikkamagaluru (p.2), Hubballi (p.4), Mysuru (p.7), Ramanagara (p.8), Vijayapura (p.10) |
| Kerala | 27 September 2020 | 5 | AQI bulletin p.3–9: count of 5 city rows placed in Kerala — Eloor (p.3), Ernakulam (p.3), Kannur (p.5), Kozhikode (p.6), Thiruvananthapuram (p.9) |
| Madhya Pradesh | 27 September 2020 | 14 | AQI bulletin p.2–9: count of 14 city rows placed in Madhya Pradesh — Bhopal (p.2), Damoh (p.3), Dewas (p.3), Gwalior (p.4), Indore (p.4), Jabalpur (p.4), Katni (p.5), Maihar (p.6), Mandideep (p.6), Pithampur (p.8), Ratlam (p.8), Sagar (p.8), Satna (p.8), Ujjain (p.9) |
| Maharashtra | 27 September 2020 | 9 | AQI bulletin p.1–9: count of 9 city rows placed in Maharashtra — Aurangabad (p.1), Chandrapur (p.2), Kalyan (p.5), Mumbai (p.6), Nagpur (p.7), Nashik (p.7), Navi Mumbai (p.7), Solapur (p.9), Thane (p.9) |
| Meghalaya | 27 September 2020 | 1 | AQI bulletin p.8: count of 1 city row placed in Meghalaya — Shillong (p.8) |
| Mizoram | 27 September 2020 | 1 | AQI bulletin p.1: count of 1 city row placed in Mizoram — Aizawl (p.1) |
| Nagaland | 27 September 2020 | 1 | AQI bulletin p.5: count of 1 city row placed in Nagaland — Kohima (p.5) |
| Odisha | 27 September 2020 | 2 | AQI bulletin p.2–9: count of 2 city rows placed in Odisha — Brajrajnagar (p.2), Talcher (p.9) |
| Punjab | 27 September 2020 | 7 | AQI bulletin p.1–8: count of 7 city rows placed in Punjab — Amritsar (p.1), Jalandhar (p.5), Khanna (p.5), Ludhiana (p.6), Mandi Gobindgarh (p.6), Patiala (p.8), Rupnagar (p.8) |
| Rajasthan | 27 September 2020 | 7 | AQI bulletin p.1–7: count of 7 city rows placed in Rajasthan — Ajmer (p.1), Alwar (p.1), Bhiwadi (p.2), Jaipur (p.4), Jodhpur (p.5), Kota (p.5), Pali (p.7) |
| Tamil Nadu | 27 September 2020 | 1 | AQI bulletin p.2: count of 1 city row placed in Tamil Nadu — Chennai (p.2) |
| Telangana | 27 September 2020 | 1 | AQI bulletin p.4: count of 1 city row placed in Telangana — Hyderabad (p.4) |
| Uttar Pradesh | 27 September 2020 | 13 | AQI bulletin p.1–9: count of 13 city rows placed in Uttar Pradesh — Agra (p.1), Baghpat (p.1), Bulandshahr (p.2), Ghaziabad (p.3), Greater Noida (p.3), Hapur (p.4), Kanpur (p.5), Lucknow (p.6), Meerut (p.6), Moradabad (p.6), Muzaffarnagar (p.7), Noida (p.7), Varanasi (p.9) |
| West Bengal | 27 September 2020 | 4 | AQI bulletin p.1–9: count of 4 city rows placed in West Bengal — Asansol (p.1), Howrah (p.4), Kolkata (p.5), Siliguri (p.9) |
| Geography | Period | Value | Where in the document |
|---|---|---|---|
| India | 27 September 2020 | 2% | AQI bulletin p.1–10, Index Value column: 2 of all 110 city rows at 201 or more — Lucknow 244 (p.6), Mandi Gobindgarh 236 (p.6) |
| Andhra Pradesh | 27 September 2020 | 0% | AQI bulletin p.1–9, Index Value column: none of 3 city rows placed in Andhra Pradesh at 201 or more (highest 42) |
| Assam | 27 September 2020 | 0% | AQI bulletin p.4, Index Value column: none of 1 city row placed in Assam at 201 or more (highest 44) |
| Bihar | 27 September 2020 | 0% | AQI bulletin p.3–8, Index Value column: none of 4 city rows placed in Bihar at 201 or more (highest 52) |
| Chandigarh | 27 September 2020 | 0% | AQI bulletin p.2, Index Value column: none of 1 city row placed in Chandigarh at 201 or more (highest 100) |
| Delhi | 27 September 2020 | 0% | AQI bulletin p.3, Index Value column: none of 1 city row placed in Delhi at 201 or more (highest 117) |
| Gujarat | 27 September 2020 | 0% | AQI bulletin p.1–9, Index Value column: none of 6 city rows placed in Gujarat at 201 or more (highest 162) |
| Haryana | 27 September 2020 | 0% | AQI bulletin p.1–10, Index Value column: none of 21 city rows placed in Haryana at 201 or more (highest 163) |
| Karnataka | 27 September 2020 | 0% | AQI bulletin p.2–10, Index Value column: none of 7 city rows placed in Karnataka at 201 or more (highest 51) |
| Kerala | 27 September 2020 | 0% | AQI bulletin p.3–9, Index Value column: none of 5 city rows placed in Kerala at 201 or more (highest 76) |
| Madhya Pradesh | 27 September 2020 | 0% | AQI bulletin p.2–9, Index Value column: none of 14 city rows placed in Madhya Pradesh at 201 or more (highest 128) |
| Maharashtra | 27 September 2020 | 0% | AQI bulletin p.1–9, Index Value column: none of 9 city rows placed in Maharashtra at 201 or more (highest 96) |
| Meghalaya | 27 September 2020 | 0% | AQI bulletin p.8, Index Value column: none of 1 city row placed in Meghalaya at 201 or more (highest 12) |
| Mizoram | 27 September 2020 | 0% | AQI bulletin p.1, Index Value column: none of 1 city row placed in Mizoram at 201 or more (highest 23) |
| Nagaland | 27 September 2020 | 0% | AQI bulletin p.5, Index Value column: none of 1 city row placed in Nagaland at 201 or more (highest 27) |
| Odisha | 27 September 2020 | 0% | AQI bulletin p.2–9, Index Value column: none of 2 city rows placed in Odisha at 201 or more (highest 131) |
| Punjab | 27 September 2020 | 14% | AQI bulletin p.1–8, Index Value column: 1 of 7 city rows placed in Punjab at 201 or more — Mandi Gobindgarh 236 (p.6) |
| Rajasthan | 27 September 2020 | 0% | AQI bulletin p.1–7, Index Value column: none of 7 city rows placed in Rajasthan at 201 or more (highest 99) |
| Tamil Nadu | 27 September 2020 | 0% | AQI bulletin p.2, Index Value column: none of 1 city row placed in Tamil Nadu at 201 or more (highest 58) |
| Telangana | 27 September 2020 | 0% | AQI bulletin p.4, Index Value column: none of 1 city row placed in Telangana at 201 or more (highest 38) |
| Uttar Pradesh | 27 September 2020 | 8% | AQI bulletin p.1–9, Index Value column: 1 of 13 city rows placed in Uttar Pradesh at 201 or more — Lucknow 244 (p.6) |
| West Bengal | 27 September 2020 | 0% | AQI bulletin p.1–9, Index Value column: none of 4 city rows placed in West Bengal at 201 or more (highest 76) |
| Geography | Period | Value | Where in the document |
|---|---|---|---|
| India | 27 September 2020 | 244 | AQI bulletin p.1–10, Index Value column: highest of all 110 city rows — Lucknow, S.No 63 (p.6), Poor |
| Andhra Pradesh | 27 September 2020 | 42 | AQI bulletin p.1–9, Index Value column: highest of 3 city rows placed in Andhra Pradesh — Rajamahendravaram, S.No 89 (p.8), Good |
| Assam | 27 September 2020 | 44 | AQI bulletin p.4, Index Value column: highest of 1 city row placed in Assam — Guwahati, S.No 38 (p.4), Good |
| Bihar | 27 September 2020 | 52 | AQI bulletin p.3–8, Index Value column: highest of 4 city rows placed in Bihar — Muzaffarpur, S.No 74 (p.7), Satisfactory, Patna, S.No 87 (p.8), Satisfactory |
| Chandigarh | 27 September 2020 | 100 | AQI bulletin p.2, Index Value column: highest of 1 city row placed in Chandigarh — Chandigarh, S.No 20 (p.2), Satisfactory |
| Delhi | 27 September 2020 | 117 | AQI bulletin p.3, Index Value column: highest of 1 city row placed in Delhi — Delhi, S.No 26 (p.3), Moderate |
| Gujarat | 27 September 2020 | 162 | AQI bulletin p.1–9, Index Value column: highest of 6 city rows placed in Gujarat — Nandesari, S.No 77 (p.7), Moderate |
| Haryana | 27 September 2020 | 163 | AQI bulletin p.1–10, Index Value column: highest of 21 city rows placed in Haryana — Faridabad, S.No 31 (p.3), Moderate |
| Karnataka | 27 September 2020 | 51 | AQI bulletin p.2–10, Index Value column: highest of 7 city rows placed in Karnataka — Chikkaballapur, S.No 23 (p.2), Satisfactory |
| Kerala | 27 September 2020 | 76 | AQI bulletin p.3–9, Index Value column: highest of 5 city rows placed in Kerala — Ernakulam, S.No 30 (p.3), Satisfactory |
| Madhya Pradesh | 27 September 2020 | 128 | AQI bulletin p.2–9, Index Value column: highest of 14 city rows placed in Madhya Pradesh — Ratlam, S.No 91 (p.8), Moderate |
| Maharashtra | 27 September 2020 | 96 | AQI bulletin p.1–9, Index Value column: highest of 9 city rows placed in Maharashtra — Thane, S.No 102 (p.9), Satisfactory |
| Meghalaya | 27 September 2020 | 12 | AQI bulletin p.8, Index Value column: highest of 1 city row placed in Meghalaya — Shillong, S.No 96 (p.8), Good |
| Mizoram | 27 September 2020 | 23 | AQI bulletin p.1, Index Value column: highest of 1 city row placed in Mizoram — Aizawl, S.No 3 (p.1), Good |
| Nagaland | 27 September 2020 | 27 | AQI bulletin p.5, Index Value column: highest of 1 city row placed in Nagaland — Kohima, S.No 58 (p.5), Good |
| Odisha | 27 September 2020 | 131 | AQI bulletin p.2–9, Index Value column: highest of 2 city rows placed in Odisha — Brajrajnagar, S.No 18 (p.2), Moderate |
| Punjab | 27 September 2020 | 236 | AQI bulletin p.1–8, Index Value column: highest of 7 city rows placed in Punjab — Mandi Gobindgarh, S.No 66 (p.6), Poor |
| Rajasthan | 27 September 2020 | 99 | AQI bulletin p.1–7, Index Value column: highest of 7 city rows placed in Rajasthan — Jodhpur, S.No 51 (p.5), Satisfactory |
| Tamil Nadu | 27 September 2020 | 58 | AQI bulletin p.2, Index Value column: highest of 1 city row placed in Tamil Nadu — Chennai, S.No 22 (p.2), Satisfactory |
| Telangana | 27 September 2020 | 38 | AQI bulletin p.4, Index Value column: highest of 1 city row placed in Telangana — Hyderabad, S.No 45 (p.4), Good |
| Uttar Pradesh | 27 September 2020 | 244 | AQI bulletin p.1–9, Index Value column: highest of 13 city rows placed in Uttar Pradesh — Lucknow, S.No 63 (p.6), Poor |
| West Bengal | 27 September 2020 | 76 | AQI bulletin p.1–9, Index Value column: highest of 4 city rows placed in West Bengal — Howrah, S.No 43 (p.4), Satisfactory |